Abortion Providers’ Baseless Request to Supreme Court to Enjoin Defendants in Texas Heartbeat Act Litigation

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

It’s not enough that Texas abortion providers continue to press a lawsuit against the Texas Heartbeat Act that should have been dismissed at the outset for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. They’re now running to the Supreme Court to try to get the Justices to enjoin state officials from enforcing a law that the law itself prohibits those state officials from enforcing. They seem to imagine that courts can enjoin a law, when what courts actually can do (upon a proper showing) is enjoin defendants from enforcing a law, but only when (among other things) defendants actually have an enforcement role.

Advertisement

The short answer to the abortion providers’ application is that the ordinary rules governing pre-enforcement challenges to laws apply in this case as well, and those ordinary rules mean that the abortion providers lack standing and that there are no defendants against whom they are entitled to obtain relief. They can instead challenge the constitutionality of the Act if and when private plaintiffs undertake to enforce it against them.

I’ll also note that because the district court hadn’t yet ruled on plaintiffs’ request to certify statewide classes of judges and clerks, the single judge and single clerk named as defendants work in only one of Texas’s 254 counties. Under plaintiffs’ own theory, they won’t be able to operate at all in Texas if the only judges and clerks against whom they were to obtain relief were these two defendants. Thus, any harm they face is the same whether or not they receive the emergency relief they seek against these two defendants. In other words, they haven’t shown that emergency relief against actual defendants would prevent any injury they allege.

Advertisement

Oddly, the abortion providers also fault the Fifth Circuit for its supposedly “rigid application of the divestiture doctrine.” But as they elsewhere acknowledge, the district court likewise granted a stay of the proceedings as to all defendants except the private citizen “based on their [i.e., defendants’] argument that the interlocutory appeal on sovereign immunity divested the court of jurisdiction.” The abortion providers’ claim that the Fifth Circuit has somehow left things “in limbo” likewise fails to acknowledge that it has acted, and can be expected to continue to act, with dispatch.

I find it especially amusing that here, as in the Fifth Circuit, the abortion providers ask that the district-court’s ruling in their favor—denying defendants’ motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds—be vacated (so that the transfer of jurisdiction over the case from the district court to the Fifth Circuit would be undone).

Advertisement

The Supreme Court should unanimously deny this request—in a heartbeat.

Recommended


CENTCOM Commander Reveals U.S. Intelligence-Sharing Operation with Taliban

The U.S. reportedly provided the Taliban with a list of U.S. citizens, green card holders, and Afghan allies.


Worse Than Saigon

In yielding Afghanistan to the Taliban, Joe Biden has engineered the worst foreign-policy disaster in a generation.


The Biden Illusion Crumbles to Dust

President Joe Biden addressed the nation and confirmed all of the worst suspicions of his critics.


The Biden Blowout Is Just Beginning

These days, a trillion-dollar spending bill is a trifle barely worth arguing over and the stuff of bipartisan consensus.


Newsom’s Recall Problem Is with Hispanic Voters

Two new polls show Hispanic voters, who heavily supported him in 2018, now favoring his ouster.


The Imminent, Inevitable Taliban Victory

Twenty years, and we are still where we were on September 10, 2001.

The Latest


The Bitter Truth: There’s Still No Rhyme or Reason to COVID-19

The stats defy the spin: This pandemic does not hinge on whether the governor is a Democrat or Republican, whether restrictions are tight or loose. It does not care.


Biden Administration Launches Civil-Rights Probes against Five States over Mask-Mandate Bans

The Education Department sent letters to leaders in Oklahoma, South Carolina, Iowa, Tennessee, and Utah.


When National Honor Meant Something

TR provides a counter-example to Biden’s fecklessness.


Accounts from Afghanistan Contradict Taliban Assurances Touted by Biden Administration

Lawmakers and veterans with sources on the ground say the Taliban’s assurances are meaningless.


Pentagon Spokesman Dodges Question on What U.S. Intelligence Knew ahead of Kabul Bombing

A reporter asked Kirby why Marines were at the gate if U.S. intelligence predicted the attack.


The Mets Still Break Your Heart

They’ve put together one of the worst stretches ever by a franchise whose bad stretches are the stuff of legend.

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.


Most Popular


Right on Cue, the President’s Mistakes Are Our Fault Again


Right on Cue, the President’s Mistakes Are Our Fault Again

You know, in a sense, you’re me and I’m you, and all of us are we — and so when the president makes a mistake, it’s really, like the universe …


Why Don’t We Tell Women What’s Making Them Miserable?


Why Don’t We Tell Women What’s Making Them Miserable?

Most American women with money, degrees, or connections will never hear that our culturally prescribed feminist lifestyle is the source of their unhappiness.


Biden Subcontracts U.S. Security to Terrorists


Biden Subcontracts U.S. Security to Terrorists

The disastrous U.S.–Taliban ‘partnership’ begins with a massacre.


View More

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *