Biden’s Fact-Free Infrastructure Fact Sheet

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

President Joe Biden looks on during a meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 25, 2021. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

On June 24, the White House put out a fact sheet on the much-celebrated bipartisan infrastructure deal. The purpose of these fact sheets is not to present a full, detailed explanation of proposed legislation, and we don’t have an actual bill yet. Indeed, the purpose is more political — to set the narrative and give the public a reference point from which to start debate on whether the proposals are good ideas. It would be unfair to expect full details from a fact sheet, but we should expect some details. Especially when the White House prefaces the whole thing with the notion that it’s “showing that democracy can deliver results.”

Advertisement

The only thing the American people know about this infrastructure deal is that politicians want to spend $1.2 trillion of their money. On what? Infrastructure. It should be said that this is an improvement over the Democrats’ proposed plan, wherein everything was infrastructure. At least we’ve narrowed down to actual infrastructure. But Congress agreeing to spend money on a broad category is a pretty low standard for celebration.

It’s a bit like planning to meet a friend for lunch. To decide where to meet, you ask what he’s in the mood for, and he replies, “Food.” Insofar as you want to have lunch with him, that’s a good thing, but it does not move you any closer to actually meeting him somewhere and having lunch.

Advertisement

Now, the fact sheet is a little better than that. It specifies $1.2 trillion in infrastructure spending and splits it into categories. Some examples: $109 billion for “roads, bridges, major projects,” $66 billion for “passenger and freight rail,” and $55 billion for “water infrastructure.”

So that’s a bit like asking your friend what he’s in the mood for, and he replies, “Food, and we should spend $50.” You wouldn’t be friends with such a person for very long. You are still not any closer to actually meeting him somewhere and having lunch.

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.

Get Jim Geraghty’s tour of the political news of the day.

Get Kevin D. Williamson’s newsletter delivered to your inbox each Tuesday.

A weekly digest on business and economics from an NR sensibility.

We’ll deliver The Capital Note to your inbox each weekday. No charge.

That’s where we stand right now with the infrastructure package. There’s no more specific information in the White House’s fact sheet. They’ve agreed to spend $1.2 trillion on infrastructure.

It’s really hard to have any kind of informed conversation based on this fact sheet. It stipulates $25 billion for airports. Is that a reasonable amount? I’m inclined to say no, just because it sounds high, but really I don’t have the faintest idea and neither does anyone else because we don’t know what they actually want to spend that money on. It could be $25 billion on building entire new airports or it could be for $25 billion worth of those airport chair-bench things for people waiting for flights.

The fact sheet says that “we must demonstrate to the world that American democracy can deliver for the American people” and “the President is showing that democracy can deliver results.” The American people regularly make clear to pollsters that they don’t really care much about infrastructure. According to the Pew Research Center, the most important issues in the 2020 election, in order of importance to voters, were the economy, health care, Supreme Court appointments, the coronavirus, violent crime, foreign policy, gun policy, racial inequality, immigration, economic inequality, climate change, and abortion. Polling by Gallup from May of this year found that the most important issues to voters, in order, were poor leadership, the coronavirus, immigration, race relations, the economy, and unemployment. There doesn’t seem to be much evidence the American people are crying out for this deal.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s not to say they won’t tell pollsters they support it, given its existence. Polls from April found support for Biden’s original $2 trillion plan. But people don’t really know what they’re supporting because politicians don’t really know what they’re proposing. By being so vague, people use their imaginations and answer polls based on what infrastructure means to them, not based on any actual proposals. And plenty of those voters would say, “Sure, whatever, but what I really want is some legislation on [insert other issue here].”

On June 11, Charlie wrote about the farcical nature of the infrastructure debate. He wrote that because of the lack of specifics and the lack of rationale for why so much spending is needed in the first place, “the real debate has not so much as begun.” This White House fact sheet with hardly any facts in it shows that we really aren’t much further along now than we were then.

Recommended


The Problems with Laurel Hubbard’s Qualifying for the Olympics as a Woman

The New Zealand weightlifter, who was born and competed as a male, has clear advantages over female competitors.


The Lab-Leak Theory: Evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Every good prosecutor will tell you that the best case is a strong circumstantial case — and that’s exactly what we have.


The Fall of Saint Anthony Fauci

On the unforced errors of America’s most political doctor.


A Grad Student Tried to Correct a Misleading COVID Narrative. Rebekah Jones Tried to Ruin His Career for It

Jon Taylor had a disagreement with Jones over COVID data, so she falsely accused him of sexual harassment.


The Breaking of Stephen Colbert

The demands of nightly doses of craven partisanship for year upon year have ruined him.


Maggie Haberman Is Right

Donald Trump really does believe that he, along with two former GOP senators, will be ‘reinstated’ to office this summer.

The Latest


Federal Court Dismisses FTC Antitrust Suit against Facebook

The Federal Trade Commission accused Facebook of engaging in ‘anticompetitive’ practices.


Biden Admin Defends BLM Nominee Despite Link to Eco-Terrorism, Support for Population Control

The White House said Stone-Manning is ‘exceptionally qualified’ to lead the Bureau of Land Management.


Another Round of Fake Florida News

Journalists have accused DeSantis of throttling the condo-collapse-emergency response.


Unemployment Rolls Shrinking Faster in States That Opted Out of Enhanced Federal Benefits

In all, 22 states have opted out of enhanced federal unemployment benefits.


The Surfside-Condo Tragedy Does Not Need Your Political Hot Take

This is a tragedy, not an election. Those pressing it into a partisan narrative are broken.


Supreme Court Declines to Take Up Transgender Bathroom Case, Leaving in Place Victory for Trans Student

The decision leaves in place a lower court’s ruling that the Virginia school board discriminated against the student.

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.


Most Popular


Where’s the Equity for Black Murder Victims?


Where’s the Equity for Black Murder Victims?

That the disproportionate number of black murder victims doesn’t exercise progressives more remains one of the paradoxes of our time.


Trump at First Rally Since Leaving Office: ‘We Won’


Trump at First Rally Since Leaving Office: ‘We Won’

In his first campaign-style rally since leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump still insisted he won the election ‘in a landslide.’


Supreme Court Declines to Take Up Transgender Bathroom Case, Leaving in Place Victory for Trans Student


Supreme Court Declines to Take Up Transgender Bathroom Case, Leaving in Place Victory for Trans Student

The decision leaves in place a lower court’s ruling that the Virginia school board discriminated against the student.


View More

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *