Blaming Children

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

Signs opposing Critical Race Theory line the entrance to the Loudoun County School Board headquarters in Ashburn, Va., June 22, 2021. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

Writing about the new, much-discussed Texas education law in The New Yorker, Benjamin Wallace-Wells concludes that its point is to “establish a protective halo around white students, so that they do not hear that their success might have something to do with their race, or that the structures of racial power and privilege in the past also apply to the present.”

It is “telling,” he writes, that the law

prohibits teachers and administrators from suggesting that “an individual’s moral character, standing, or worth is necessarily determined by the individual’s race or sex.” It insists that no individual student should “feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of the individual’s race or sex.”

This description of the law (echoed by Timothy Snyder in this much worse New York Times Magazine essay) is not quite right. The law does not insist that students should not feel discomfort or guilt based on their race; it insists that teachers not instruct them that they should feel distress based on their race. A teacher is not violating the law if a lesson about the long history of white mistreatment of blacks in the U.S. causes a white student to feel shame. What the teacher may not do is say that white students should be ashamed of this history. (Or — the text of the law is objectionably ambiguous on this point — say that some people have believed in collective guilt for white people.)

Wallace-Wells is more generous toward the law’s backers than many of the other critics have been. “The bill doesn’t rewrite history in the way that the campaigns to protect Confederate memorialization have sometimes sought to,” he concedes, before making his own critique: “Instead, it tries to cleave off students from any feeling of historical responsibility — as if, with each generation, America were re-created, blameless and anew. . . . The debate isn’t about history, exactly. It is about the possibility of blamelessness.”

When we ascribe “responsibility” for an injustice to a person or group, we may be saying that they deserve condemnation for inflicting that injustice, or we may be saying that they are duty-bound to rectify it. All schoolkids, regardless of their race, are responsible in that second sense for advancing justice, simply by virtue of being presumptive future citizens. No schoolchildren, regardless of their race, are responsible in the first sense for slavery, discrimination, and their lingering effects. The provisions of the law that Wallace-Wells quotes aim to affirm that last proposition. That’s the right side of the debate to be on.

Recommended


The Coming Backlash against Woke Public Schools

Parents have had enough of the politicization of their local schools. And even if the schools themselves can’t see it yet, they will soon.


The Lab-Leak Theory: Evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Every good prosecutor will tell you that the best case is a strong circumstantial case — and that’s exactly what we have.


The Problems with Laurel Hubbard’s Qualifying for the Olympics as a Woman

The New Zealand weightlifter, who was born and competed as a male, has clear advantages over female competitors.


A Grad Student Tried to Correct a Misleading COVID Narrative. Rebekah Jones Tried to Ruin His Career for It

Jon Taylor had a disagreement with Jones over COVID data, so she falsely accused him of sexual harassment.


The Breaking of Stephen Colbert

The demands of nightly doses of craven partisanship for year upon year have ruined him.


Maggie Haberman Is Right

Donald Trump really does believe that he, along with two former GOP senators, will be ‘reinstated’ to office this summer.

The Latest


Eric Adams Says Vote Counting Raises ‘Serious Questions’ after Losing Ground In NYC Mayor’s Race

The candidate demanded the board explain apparent discrepancies in the most recent dump of rank-choice voting results.


Pro-China ‘Engagement’ and Genocide Denial Go Hand in Hand on Communist Party’s 100th

A maliciously inaccurate op-ed by a British politician speaks to the unsavory concessions at the heart of a policy of engagement with China.


McCarthy Claims CRT Echoes Past Dem Racism in Speech Calling for Removal of Confederate Statues

‘All the statues being removed by this bill are statues of Democrats,’ McCarthy noted.


Top GOP Senators Demand NIH Director Disclose COVID Data Deletion Details

The senators are requesting information about Chinese efforts to delete NIH data pertinent to COVID’s origins.


A 2020 Election Audit Is a Bad Idea for Pennsylvania Republicans

They should focus on protecting the integrity of elections against the many real threats of fraud, not chase down conspiracy theories.


Who Wants to Defund the Police?

Now that crime rates are skyrocketing and the polling has turned against them, Democrats are rewriting recent history.

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.


Most Popular


The Rise of Equity Charges at Restaurants


The Rise of Equity Charges at Restaurants

Telling your customers you are going to begin charging them more because they are too bigoted to tip fairly might not be a winning restaurant strategy.


The Devil and Garry Wills


The Devil and Garry Wills

An abortion proponent’s embarrassing attempt to refute the pro-life position.


The Justice Department’s Stunt Voting-Rights Lawsuit against the Georgia Election Law


The Justice Department’s Stunt Voting-Rights Lawsuit against the Georgia Election Law

The complaint reads more like an op-ed in Mother Jones than a legal case.


View More

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *