EXCLUSIVE: An ‘Intervenor’ at Yesterday’s Court Case in Arizona Just Happened to be a Partner at the Firm the Judge Worked At Long Ago When the Judge Worked There

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

The newly appointed judge had another challenging issue yesterday in the Arizona court. One of the presenters who argued for the Democrats’ was a partner at the law firm Judge Martin worked at while Martin was there.

Yesterday morning we reported that the top judge who appointed Judge Martin to the case on either Sunday or Monday is the wife of one of the five Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS), Bill Gates. These same Supervisors have done all they could to stop the audit in Maricopa County from ever occurring. It appeared that Bill Gates got the judge he wanted.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: New Judge in Election Case in Arizona, Judge Martin, Was Picked by Judge and Wife of Maricopa County Supervisor, Bill Gates! (AUDIO)

A hearing was held yesterday and Judge Dan Martin ended up allowing the audit to continue but demanded the auditors release their audit policies. The policies might be what the Democrats wanted the entire time.

TRENDING: NEW: Biden Justice Department Weighing Domestic Terrorism Law to Target ‘White Supremacists’

BREAKING: FEAR-MONGERING FAIL! — Arizona Court Rules Maricopa County Audit Will Go On – No Temporary Restraining Order!

But one thing we noticed in yesterday’s trial was the presentation of an individual in the case. This man worked with Judge Martin in the past at Brown and Bain.

Attorney Daniel Barr with Perkins Coie presented at the hearing yesterday as an intervenor:

The Barr argued the following base on individuals watching the case on Livestream:

But what we uncovered about Mr. Barr is he is a partner of Perkins Coie and also was a partner at the company Judge Martin worked at, which merged with Perkins Coie.

But according to a document we found on the Wayback machine, Mr. Barr was with Brown and Bain which merged with Perkins Coie. Barr was a partner since 1992 at that company.

This happens to be the same company Judge Martin worked at starting in 1992:

This means that a partner at the former law firm Judge Martin worked at was there when the Judge was there. The same guy presented in yesterday’s case in front of Judge Martin. This too smells like something that needed to be announced or dealt with at yesterday’s trial. Was this another potential conflict of interest?

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *