Florida Judge Makes Inconvenient Student-Masking Data Disappear

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media
( igoriss/Getty Images)

In the COVID era of debate, appeals to authority have gone viral. I recently mentioned one example: Politifact rated “false” the claim that student-masking “lacks a well-grounded scientific justification.” One might assume that Politifact cited data showing that masks on students slow viral spread, improve health outcomes, and have minimal effect on learning and socialization. Nope! All it could do was appeal to the authority of the CDC and like-minded researchers who offered such ringing endorsements as, “Mechanistically, it is a little hard to believe masking would not have some effect.”

Advertisement

Last week, as part of his ruling against Florida governor Ron DeSantis’s mask-optional policy, a state judge engaged in perhaps the most egregious appeal to authority I have seen so far. By way of background, the governor’s order banning mask mandates had cited “a Brown University study [that] analyzed COVID-19 data for schools in Florida and found no correlation with mask mandates.” That is indeed what the study found. Keep that in mind.

The Brown University study’s lead author Emily Oster and her co-authors did include several disclaimers in their paper about the limitations of observational studies — e.g., “we cannot make strong causal claims,” “we [could] not control for community mitigation practices,” and so on. That’s all fine. Everyone agrees that a randomized controlled trial would be more definitive, but for now this is the best we have.

The authors went too far, however, when they suggested in their summary that students should wear masks anyway:

We would emphasize that in general this [other] literature suggests in-person school can be operated safely with appropriate mitigation, which typically includes universal masking. It would be premature to draw any alternative conclusions about this question based on this preliminary data.

This implicit endorsement of masking may or may not be justified based on other evidence, but it indisputably does not follow from the data analysis in their paper. The authors’ remarks here are analogous to “dicta” in a judicial opinion — side observations that are not part of the actual holding.

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.

Get Jim Geraghty’s tour of the political news of the day.

Get Kevin D. Williamson’s newsletter delivered to your inbox each Tuesday.

A weekly digest on business and economics from an NR sensibility.

Now back to that Florida judge. In his decision, he uses the authors’ dicta not merely to cast doubt on their findings, but to deny that their findings even exist! He delivered his opinion orally, so the text is choppy, but here is the relevant part:

This study doesn’t say masking is not effective. In fact, it recommends universal masking. . . . [DeSantis] said that [the Brown report] had analyzed Covid data and found no correlation with mask mandates. If that’s true, why did the Brown report recommend that universal masking was still the way to go?

Now I don’t say that the governor has time enough to read a report that’s that thick, but his advisors do. So the statement in the executive order is just incorrect. That study does not find “no correlation” with mask mandates.

Remember, “no correlation” is exactly what the study found. However, this judge believes that appeals to authority are so powerful that they can make data disappear. Because the authors added some side comments about how they still favor masking, the judge literally cannot believe that their data analysis tends to support the opposite position. In this legal proceeding, the word of the authorities trumps actual evidence.

The danger here is underappreciated. Prior to COVID, there had been a movement to “democratize” science in the sense that data and code-sharing should be the norm, and that working papers could receive informal peer review from just about anyone on the Internet. The point was to avoid having a priestly class that could make unquestioned pronouncements about The Science. Now the priestly class is back with a vengeance. People who disagree with the public-health establishment are widely censored, “but the CDC says . . .” has become a mic-dropping argument, and judges are so enamored with expert authority that they cannot even comprehend the existence of contrary data.

Recommended


The Biden Illusion Crumbles to Dust

President Joe Biden addressed the nation and confirmed all of the worst suspicions of his critics.


Newsom’s Recall Problem Is with Hispanic Voters

Two new polls show Hispanic voters, who heavily supported him in 2018, now favoring his ouster.


The Biden Blowout Is Just Beginning

These days, a trillion-dollar spending bill is a trifle barely worth arguing over and the stuff of bipartisan consensus.


The Imminent, Inevitable Taliban Victory

Twenty years, and we are still where we were on September 10, 2001.


A Misleading Narrative about the Unvaccinated

You don’t have to look far on social media to find people contending that the remaining unvaccinated are overwhelmingly Republicans.


Democrats Finally Get Comfortable Saying Obama Is a Jerk

Democrats finally feel safe saying out loud that Barack Obama can be a narcissistic, self-absorbed, tone-deaf jerk.

The Latest


Biden’s Afghanistan Speech Was a Dishonest, Incoherent, Contradictory Mess

It’s even worse when you read the transcript.


Mother of Fallen Soldier Blames Biden for Kabul Attack: ‘It Should Have Never Happened’

‘Who is accountable for this? Who will stand up and say that they will be accountable for the death of 13 young men and women?’ she asked.


Texas Becomes First State to Implement Fetal Heartbeat Law after Supreme Court Declines to Act

The bill ‘ensures that the life of every unborn child who has a heartbeat will be saved from the ravages of abortion,’ Abbott said.


The Crumbling Justification for Vaccine Passports

New findings are weakening the rationale for segregating people based on their vaccination status.


HHS Denies Conscience Freedom for Physicians

What can you do when the president brazenly admits that he is trampling on constitutionally protected freedoms?


A Blatant, Corrupt Power Grab by Rhode Island’s Governor

After it looked like the legislature was finally about to reclaim its authority, Governor McKee plunged the state back into unilateral rule.

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.


Most Popular


The Bitter Truth: There’s Still No Rhyme or Reason to COVID-19


The Bitter Truth: There’s Still No Rhyme or Reason to COVID-19

The stats defy the spin: This pandemic does not hinge on whether the governor is a Democrat or Republican, whether restrictions are tight or loose. It does not care.


White House Dodges on Bombshell Report That Taliban Offered U.S. Control of Kabul


White House Dodges on Bombshell Report That Taliban Offered U.S. Control of Kabul

President Biden owes the American people answers.


Biden’s Disgrace


Biden’s Disgrace

He has not only made us less safe, he has dishonored us, and that can never be forgotten or forgiven.


View More

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *