House Democrats Prepare to Pass Extreme Abortion Bill

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) holds her weekly news conference on Capitol Hill August 6, 2021. (Gabrielle Crockett/Reuters)

Democrats have been threatening for years now to “codify Roe v. Wade,” by which they appear to have meant enacting the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA), one of the most pro-abortion pieces of legislation Congress has ever considered.

It’s been interesting to watch Democrats discuss the bill and struggle with its title, the “Women’s Health Protection Act.” The “women’s rights” movement of late has been engaged in a campaign to scrub the word “woman” from its vocabulary, out of deference to the transgender-activist movement.

Advertisement

Advertisement

“Pregnant women” has become “birthing people,” and female nouns are replaced with gender-neutral ones so as not to offend those who insist that men, too, can become pregnant. Earlier this week, the ACLU airbrushed the word “woman” out of a quote from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, replacing it with the politically correct “[people].”

One has to imagine that, had the WHPA first been introduced this year, Democrats would’ve been at pains to title it something safer and far less snappy, like the “People’s Health Protection Act” or the “Protecting Health for Birthing Persons Act.”

After delaying the effort to pass the bill for several years, Democrats have seized on the uproar over the Texas Heartbeat Act as the right moment to turn their attention back to Roe, perhaps even to preempt the possibility that the Court might overturn its abortion jurisprudence in the upcoming Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

In essence, the WHPA would invalidate nearly every state provision in the entire country that limits abortion in any way — including those that have been permitted to stand under the regime created and sustained by RoeDoe v. Bolton, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Advertisement

The WHPA would strike down any state abortion law that isn’t applied to a “medically comparable procedure” — which assumes that abortion itself is a “medical” procedure (it isn’t). The legislation defers to abortionists as to what constitutes “a medically comparable procedure.”

Advertisement

Among the existing state policies that would be invalidated if the WHPA becomes law: informed-consent laws, bans on sex-selective and disability based abortions, 24-hour waiting periods, and laws to protect the health and safety of women.

Most appalling, the WHPA would override state restrictions on abortion after the unborn child is old enough to survive outside the womb, requiring only a single abortionist to certify that a woman’s “health” necessitates a late-term abortion. As our own John McCormack has reported, the bill “explicitly instructs the courts to ‘liberally’ interpret the legislation, and . . . ‘doesn’t distinguish’ between physical and mental health.”

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.

Get Jim Geraghty’s tour of the political news of the day.

Get Kevin D. Williamson’s newsletter delivered to your inbox each Tuesday.

A weekly digest on business and economics from an NR sensibility.

In short, not only does the bill “codify Roe” as Democrats promise, but it takes Roe several steps further, refusing to allow the American people to regulate abortion at even the outermost edges via state law.

The WHPA has faced plenty of criticism, including from San Francisco’s Catholic archbishop Salvatore Cordileone, who described it as “nothing short of child sacrifice.”

In response, House speaker Nancy Pelosi — who promised to bring the bill up for a vote in response to the Texas Heartbeat Act — brandished her Catholic credentials: “I’m Catholic. I come from a pro-life family, not active in that regard, different in their view of a woman’s right to choose.”

Advertisement

“I believe that God has given us a free will to honor our responsibilities,” Pelosi said, adding, “For us, [having a child] was a complete and total blessing, which we enjoy every day of our lives, but it’s not our business how other people choose the size and timing of their family.”

But of course, the archbishop, like virtually every opponent of the bill, has never indicated that Catholics should control “how other people choose the size and timing of their family.” Rather, they believe that it’s unacceptable to regulate the size of one’s family by killing an unborn human being.

Recommended


My Going Maskless Is Different, Says San Francisco Mayor, Because ‘I Was Feeling the Spirit’

Know who else feels the spirit and objects to the fun police? Everybody, that’s who.


Justice Kavanaugh Refuses to Buckle

He had to have known that voting as he did in the Texas case would bring him bad press.


The Real Story in Durham’s Indictment of Democratic Lawyer Michael Sussmann

The special counsel’s final report on the Clinton campaign’s manufacturing of the Trump–Russia collusion narrative will be very interesting reading.


Senator Sinema to Nancy Pelosi: Break Your Word on Infrastructure, and I’m Out

Sinema reportedly has told Joe Biden that she’s aware of the game being played by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.


The Real Biden Presidency Emerges

The heroic period of his administration was always a mirage.


Australians Are Suffering from Excessive COVID Lockdowns

The political class that has dreamed up and enforced these restrictions has been largely insulated from the consequences.

The Latest


Biden Lashes Out at Mounted Del Rio Border Patrol Agents: ‘Those People Will Pay’

Biden falsely claimed that videos show migrants ‘being strapped.’


Former Boss Accuses CNN’s Chris Cuomo of Sexual Harassment

Ross published a photo of an email Cuomo allegedly sent apologizing for the groping incident.


Trump Allies’ Arizona Election Audit Confirms Biden Victory

The audit found that Biden won by a larger margin than was recorded on election day.


Big-Government Conservatism Has Hurt the Cause

In this current era, too many on the right have fallen prey to the lures of a bellicose, centralizing populism.


School-Board Candidate with a National Platform Is Urging Fellow Reformers to Keep It Local

Ilya Shapiro works on national issues at the Cato Institute. But as a school-board candidate, he’s avoiding the broader culture war.


The Triumph of Biotechnology and Private Capital

COVID vaccines are a triumph of the biotechnology industry and of the venture capitalists and wealthy angel investors who fund it.

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *