Monopolizing the Marketplace of Ideas

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

Baker Jack Phillips, decorates a cake in his Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Colo., September 21, 2017. (Rick Wilking/Reuters)

In case you hadn’t noticed, views on free speech are changing. In the past, we defended our neighbor’s right to express views we disliked. Today, the American Booksellers Association apologizes for the “violent” act of promoting controversial books in its newsletter. In the past, we valued tolerance. Today, some cultural elites consider dissent from certain ideologies to be indefensible.

Advertisement

Advertisement

These changes have legal consequences. Those seeking to control how we think don’t stop with our jobs or social-media accounts. They enlist state power to get their way. Jack Phillips and Lorie Smith know this firsthand.

Jack is the Lakewood cake designer who declined to create a custom cake celebrating a same-sex wedding. The state of Colorado sued him. He won at the U.S. Supreme Court. After he declined a lawyer’s request to create a pink-and-blue cake celebrating a gender transition, the state sued him again. He won that, too. Now, that activist lawyer is suing Jack for the same thing.

As Lorie Smith watched Jack’s plight, she realized how things would play out. Lorie is a Denver-area website designer who started her own design business to have greater artistic freedom to choose her projects. But the same law that forced Jack to create custom cakes celebrating same-sex marriage also requires Lorie to create custom wedding websites celebrating same-sex marriage. Knowing this would violate her conscience, she asked a court to protect her First Amendment right to choose which messages she promotes.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, a federal appellate court ruled against her. Why? Not because she discriminates. She doesn’t. The state conceded this. And the court agreed, acknowledging that Lorie is “willing to work with all people regardless of sexual orientation.” The court also agreed that Lorie’s websites consist of speech covered by the First Amendment and that the state is forcing her to promote certain views. The end result? Colorado’s law creates a “substantial risk of excising certain ideas or viewpoints from the public dialogue.” Those ideas are Lorie’s religious ideas defining marriage to be between a man and a woman. “Eliminating such ideas is [the law’s] very purpose,” said the court.

Advertisement

Despite all this, the court said the state can override Lorie’s First Amendment rights and compel her to promote same-sex marriage online because those wanting to promote that view cannot obtain “services of the same quality and nature as those that” Lorie offers. Lorie somehow managed to create a “monopoly” through her one-person studio.

So let’s get this straight. Billion-dollar tech companies delete content on their websites and de-platform people from those sites every day. But a solo religious artist running her studio has become such a monopoly that the state can force her to design and publish websites promoting views that violate her convictions?

Now let’s get real. This isn’t about monopolies controlling access to services in the marketplace. This is about the government excluding dissenters from the marketplace of ideas. Even the court agreed that consumers “may be able to obtain wedding-website design services from other businesses.” There are, after all, over 77,000 web-design firms in the U.S. alone.

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.

Get Jim Geraghty’s tour of the political news of the day.

Get Kevin D. Williamson’s newsletter delivered to your inbox each Tuesday.

A weekly digest on business and economics from an NR sensibility.

But apparently that’s not good enough. Mimicking certain cultural trends, Colorado officials disdain certain views on marriage, want to eradicate them, and demand that those like Lorie and Jack — religious artists and small-business owners — profess different views or lose their livelihoods. And this should be alarming whether you agree with Lorie’s and Jack’s views on marriage or not. When the state can punish speakers based on ideological disagreements and force people to speak messages they disagree with, everyone loses. That’s because the implications of this case transcend marriage. If not today, then tomorrow, when the cultural winds shift again on a different topic.

Thankfully, this court decision won’t be the last word. With the help of her Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys, Lorie has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to step in and protect the freedom of all Americans. Do we live in a free marketplace of ideas? Or do state officials have a monopoly to control the views we do and don’t express? The stakes are too great for a wrong answer.

Advertisement

Jonathan Scruggs, senior counsel and director of the Center for Conscience Initiatives at Alliance Defending Freedom (@Alliance Defends), represents Lorie Smith and her web-design business, 303 Creative.

Recommended


Border Patrol Outraged by Biden’s Scapegoating: ‘He Just Started a War’

‘I see the administration wants to fry our agents, he just started a war with Border Patrol,’ said one agent.


Why Aren’t Americans Protesting in the Streets?

No one seems to care that Democrats are walking us into a fiscal catastrophe.


Justice Kavanaugh Refuses to Buckle

He had to have known that voting as he did in the Texas case would bring him bad press.


The Real Story in Durham’s Indictment of Democratic Lawyer Michael Sussmann

The special counsel’s final report on the Clinton campaign’s manufacturing of the Trump–Russia collusion narrative will be very interesting reading.


Senator Sinema to Nancy Pelosi: Break Your Word on Infrastructure, and I’m Out

Sinema reportedly has told Joe Biden that she’s aware of the game being played by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.


The Real Biden Presidency Emerges

The heroic period of his administration was always a mirage.

The Latest


Media Corrections Come Too Late for Publicly Shamed Border Patrol Agents

The agents have been publicly shamed by President Biden and much of his party and placed on desk duty.


Murders Soared 30 Percent in 2020 in Largest Annual Increase on Record

More than 21,000 homicides were reported in 2020.


John Hinckley, Who Shot President Reagan, to Be Granted Unconditional Release

Hinckley shot Reagan outside of a Washington, D.C., hotel in 1981.


Biden’s Tax Plan Calls for Indiscriminate Spying

Biden’s proposal would turn all financial accounts into open books for the IRS.


Biden Administration Moves to ‘Protect and Fortify’ DACA

The new rule is an effort to save the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.


Abbott Vows to Hire Border Patrol Agents Punished over ‘Whipping’ Incident

Biden has said the agents would ‘pay’ for their conduct.

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.


Most Popular


The Gangs of L.A.


The Gangs of L.A.

A shocking new report suggests that in Los Angeles County, sheriff’s deputies make up some of the most dangerous crime syndicates of all.


Return to Middle-earth


Return to Middle-earth

A new, expertly edited collection of J. R. R. Tolkien’s writing on his elaborate mythology reminds us of its greatness.


Baby’s Parents Refuse to End Life Support, Lose Custody to State


Baby’s Parents Refuse to End Life Support, Lose Custody to State

Keaton Crull, a three-month-old baby from Indiana being treated in Kentucky, is about to be removed from life support over his parents’ objections.


View More

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *