This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism–July 25

uTN Social - Free Speech Social Media

1990—Less than three months after appointing New Hampshire supreme court justice David Hackett Souter to the First Circuit, President George H.W. Bush nominates him to the Supreme Court vacancy resulting from Justice Brennan’s retirement.

Displaying his usual perspicacity and deploying his full arsenal of clichés, Teddy Kennedy, one of nine Democrats to vote against Souter’s confirmation, rails against Souter: Souter had not demonstrated “a sufficient commitment to the core constitutional values at the heart of our democracy.” His record “raised troubling questions about the depth of his commitment to the role of the Supreme Court and Congress in protecting individual rights and liberties under the Constitution.” His record on civil rights was “particularly troubling” and “reactionary.” On voting rights, he “was willing to defend the indefensible.” He was not “genuinely concerned about the rights of women” and had “alarming” views on Roe v. Wade. He would “turn back the clock on the historic progress of recent decades.”

Advertisement

Alas, as a justice, Souter was far more left-wing on hot-button issues than even Kennedy could have hoped. Contrary to media depictions of him as a “moderate,” Souter read into the Constitution the Left’s agenda on a broad range of issues: for example, abortion (including partial-birth abortion), homosexual conduct (including a virtual declaration of a constitutional right to same-sex marriage), imposition of secularism as the national creed, and reliance on foreign law to determine the meaning of the Constitution.

2018—An Eleventh Circuit panel rules (in Lewis v. Governor of Alabama) that plaintiffs challenging Alabama’s Minimum Wage Act, which displaced a higher minimum wage adopted by the city of Birmingham, “have stated a plausible claim” that the law “had the purpose and effect of depriving Birmingham’s black citizens equal economic opportunities on the basis of race, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.”

Advertisement

The panel’s reasoning has radical implications for further judicial intrusion on the legislative processes. The panel concludes that the allegation that the state law denied 37% of Birmingham’s black wage earners a higher wage, compared to only 27% of white wage earners, would suffice to show “discriminatory impact.” The panel doesn’t say what disparity would be too small. (It would be surprising if lots of routine legislative actions didn’t have a much larger disparate impact.) Nor does it confront the reality that a higher minimum wage could have a disproportionate impact on job loss and on loss of entry-level job opportunities for black workers.

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.

Get Jim Geraghty’s tour of the political news of the day.

Get Kevin D. Williamson’s newsletter delivered to your inbox each Tuesday.

A weekly digest on business and economics from an NR sensibility.

The panel further cites the 10% disparity as evidence of discriminatory purpose and adds in what it sees as the “rushed, reactionary, and racially polarized nature of the legislative process.” Are we really going to have judges deciding how long a legislative process ought to take? And while the panel finds of special interest the race of the legislators and of the members of the Birmingham city council, it never stops to consider whether they divide along the same lines on economic policy. If these considerations “plausibly imply discriminatory motivations were at play,” then lots of ordinary legislative decisions will be subject to judicial second-guessing.

In January 2019, the full Eleventh Circuit will vacate the panel’s opinion and grant rehearing en banc, and in December 2019 it will rule that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue.

Advertisement

2018—In Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Chino Valley Unified School District, a Ninth Circuit panel rules that a school board’s practice of allowing an invocation to be offered at its meetings violates the Establishment Clause. The panel evades the Supreme Court’s rulings approving legislative prayer by contending, implausibly, that the school-board meetings are not legislative in nature.

Recommended


Is COVID China’s Chernobyl?

As we experience the pandemic’s toll on the world, we can speculate about its implications for the Chinese regime.


Biden’s ‘Double Death Tax’

The White House is proposing what would amount to a second estate tax. The one we already have is bad enough.


The Navy’s Debauchery Problem: An Enlisted Perspective

Senator Tom Cotton’s report on the service branch gets a lot right about the upper ranks, but the enlisted side remains in dire need of attention.


American Men Suffer a Friendship Recession

American men have fewer friends than in decades past. We should dedicate time to fostering friendships. They provide an immediate and enduring reward.


Lindsey Graham Is an Idiot

Democrats are treating the infrastructure and reconciliation bills as linked, and so should Republicans and everybody else.


The Kids Are Not Alright: Chaos at the College Republican National Committee

College Republican chapters all over the country claim they are being disenfranchised by a president seeking to consolidate power.

The Latest


Where the Money Goes, No One Knows

FEMA stonewalls Congress on how much it’s spending to relocate illegal immigrants to cities and towns around the country.


Radical Exchange: How Turkey and Iran Infiltrate Young American Minds

This year they have intensified their efforts to turn impressionable American students against Israel and the U.S.


How the West Lost God

The overwhelming cause of secularization in the West has been government control of education.


Ethel Rosenberg: Tragedy or Traitor?

A new book argues for the former. But evidence still points to the latter.


Friends in High Places

The saints led dramatic, real, human lives in history, and their stories are inspiring and applicable for all of us today.


Former FDA Commissioner Blasts CDC Delta-Variant Modeling

Scott Gottlieb, who led the FDA during the Trump administration, blasted the varied projections as ‘deeply disappointing and not actionable.’

Top Stories

Get our conservative analysis delivered right to you. No charge.


Most Popular


Public Enemy No. 1: The Couple Who Started a Wildfire through a Gender Reveal


Public Enemy No. 1: The Couple Who Started a Wildfire through a Gender Reveal

It can be tempting to try to transfer all the anguish caused by disasters, whether they be fires or shootings, onto one party. We can do better than that.


Whitmer-Kidnap Case Enters ‘Entrapment’ Phase


Whitmer-Kidnap Case Enters ‘Entrapment’ Phase

But do the Wolverine Watchmen militia members have a valid claim?


Brett Kavanaugh Faces Another Round of Smears and Intimidation


Brett Kavanaugh Faces Another Round of Smears and Intimidation

The New York Times leaves out several key details from a report that tries to cast a cloud of suspicion over Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh.


View More

Read More Feedzy

The Foxhole App - Trusted News Podcasts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *